The debate over the installation of electric vehicle chargers in Missouri continues, with members of the House committee divided on the issue. While some see the requirement as a violation of business freedoms, others believe that local governments should bear the burden of these costs. The bill, which is supported by both the fossil fuel industry and the Missouri Retailers Association, has sparked controversy and sparked discussions about the pace of EV adoption in the state.
On one hand, proponents of the bill argue that the lack of EV charging infrastructure is a barrier to the widespread adoption of electric vehicles. However, the opponents claim that mandating businesses to install chargers is unjustified, as it not only imposes extra costs but also undermines the rights of business owners. Instead, they suggest that the government should provide financial support to cities and counties that are eager to promote EV adoption.
See also: European Union plan to effectively ban new petrol and diesel car sales from 2035
Despite the ongoing disagreement, one thing is clear: the transition to electrification in the automotive sector requires a comprehensive and coordinated effort from all stakeholders. Whether it is the government, businesses, or local communities, everyone has a role to play in ensuring the success of this transition. However, the bill in question may slow down the process by shifting the responsibility of infrastructure development from businesses to local government. Ultimately, the decision on this bill will have significant consequences for the future of EVs in Missouri.
“We’ve gotten the cart before the horse in many, many ways,” said the sponsor of the bill, Republican Rep. Jim Murphy, from St. Louis County. “When we look at electric vehicles, are they the future? Maybe. Probably. But not assuredly… What we’re doing now is using building codes to push political agendas, and what this is — really it’s a new green deal piece of legislation to force people into something that they really can’t afford to do,” he said according to NPR.
See also: Ford announces $3.7 billion investment to build EVs plant in three Midwestern US states
Murphy, backed by both the Missouri Retailers Association and fossil fuel interests, has repeatedly introduced similar legislation after St. Louis County and the city of St. Louis passed laws requiring businesses to install chargers in certain cases, such as expansion.
He believes more charging stations are problematic beyond cost considerations, asking if there will be fights if gas-guzzling trucks can’t park in electric charging spots. On the opposing side, a Sierra Club representative, Jack Meinzenbach, criticizes the bill for taking away local control and argues that areas with more charging stations attract more EV owners.
